Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) is expected to plead guilty to insider trading later this week. A change of plea hearing was scheduled for Collins on Tuesday and Collins’s alleged co-conspirators will change their pleas on Wednesday.
Collins was indicted in August 2018 by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). According to the 30-page indictment, the alleged insider trading scheme involved multiple members of Collins’s family. Also named in the original indictment are the congressman’s son, Cameron Collins, and his in-law through marriage, Stephen Zarsky, the father of Cameron Collins’ spouse.
As Law&Crime reported at the time, Collins was already under investigation–and knew he was under investigation–when the alleged insider trading scheme went into operation.
In January 2017, Collins was overheard by reporters while he was using his cellphone in the halls of Congress. The congressman appeared to be bragging about his ability to call publicly-traded stocks. Collins reportedly said, “Do you know how many millionaires I’ve made in Buffalo the past few months?”
In April 2017, the Daily Beast reported on Collins’ ties to Innate–an Australia-based pharmaceutical company–and noted that “Collins’s children, his chief of staff, and a score of campaign donors” purchased shares in the company apparently based on Collins’ advocacy. Eventually those stock prices tripled.
Collins himself eventually grew weary of all the press his relationship with Innate and the stock market was getting. The SDNY indictment also included an email from the congressman regarding the coverage of his family, their money moves and his position with Innate. Collins wrote, “We want this to go away.”
Instead, the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) took a long look at Collins, his family and their finances.
In October 2017, the OCE referred the matter to the official House Ethics Committee. That referral notes:
Representative Collins is a board member of Innate Immunotherapeutics Limited (“Innate”) and holds stock in the company. Representative Collins may have shared material nonpublic information in the purchase of Innate stock. If Representative Collins shared material nonpublic information in the purchase of Innate stock, then he may have violated House rules, standards of conduct, and federal law.
Representative Collins may have also purchased discounted Innate stock that was not available to the public and that was offered to him based on his status as a Member of the House of Representatives. If Representative Collins purchased discounted stock that was not available to the public and that was offered to him based on his status as a Member of the House of Representatives, then he may have violated House rules, standards of conduct, and federal law.
After that, then-Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) asked the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to investigate her colleague’s trading behavior. The SEC eventually worked in conjunction with the SDNY and the Federal Bureau of Investigation on the charges against Collins and his family.
The three shared 13 distinct counts, including: conspiracy, securities fraud, wire fraud and making false statements to law enforcement. Each of the defendants originally pleaded not guilty. Upon his arrest, Collins said, he would “continue to fight the meritless charges brought against me and I look toward to having my good name cleared of any wrongdoing.”
Collins, who was the first member of Congress to endorse then-nominee Donald Trump for president, narrowly defeated Democratic challenger Nate McMurray in 2018–winning by less than a percentage point. McMurray plans a rematch against Collins in 2020.
[image via Win McNamee/Getty Images]